The Impact of Voice & Sound : the audio web is still in the 90s

 

The audio internet, whether that’s voice-activated devices powered by machine learning AI or journalistic podcasts, is at an equivalent stage of development as the World Wide Web in the mid-90s.  This was the point that resonated most sonorously with panellists at a World Media Group Briefing this week entitled The Impact of Voice & Sound.

 

It was an assertion starkly illustrated by Brenda Salinas, who works on news partnerships at Google.  Salinas showed the audience an image of The Washington Post‘s homepage in 1996 — primitive and clumsy by today’s design standards.  “I think in terms of the audio internet, this is where we are,” she said. “It’s a very nascent technology but it has a lot of potential.”

 

Salinas’s point was echoed by Nate Lanxon, technology editor at Bloomberg, who talked about how in the mid-90s, meta-tagging helped make online content searchable, but in a very rudimentary way. “That’s where we’re at with podcasts today,” he said.

 

Elevating journalism

But while there was a consensus that audio technology is fledgling, there was also enthusiasm about the opportunities it already provided.  Sebastian Tomich, global head of advertising at The New York Times, explained how award-winning journalism had been augmented by an embrace of audio. The newspaper’s The Daily podcast is often the number two ranking podcast in the world.

 

The publisher has also been experimenting with more unusual ways that audio can complement print journalism. This saw it create an “audiozine”, a sonic magazine that introduced listeners to sounds they would never experience in real life, sending listeners on an audio voyage featuring, among other things, laughing rats.

 

Audio proliferation

Event chair Clancy Childs, chief product and technology officer at Dow Jones Professional Information, explained that the “amount of audio-friendly content is multiplying minute by minute” and asked: what are the implications for publishers and brands?

 

For Jeremy Pounder, futures director at Mindshare, the launch of Amazon Echo in the UK, “represented a quite fundamental break in how people interact with tech”.  “We felt that voice and talking to something with a seemingly human voice speaking back, it was a new type of interaction that we’ve not seen in society before,” he added.

 

Experiments conducted alongside research firm Neuro-Insight saw Mindshare discover that sound outperforms text in terms of “cognitive load” on someone’s brain. “When voice works well, it’s a very streamlined way to achieve a task. With text, there’s more going on, with the brain having to work out what’s the important information it’s looking for.”

 

Ethical barriers

But there are ethical concerns too. “One of the biggest is that voice might reinforce gender stereotypes,” he said.  Such as that older men tend to prefer the AI voice of young women, reflecting an increasingly outmoded, patriarchal attitude. “Do brands want to tap into that or take a more progressive stance and challenge some of those stereotypes?”

 

Sonic branding

The session also looked into how music could play a part in a customer’s experience of a brand.   Hamish Goulding, head of global brand strategy and creative at HSBC, explained how the bank’s journey into creating a sonic brand saw it recruit the talents of musician Jean-Michel Jarre.

 

Jarre produced seven tracks, from a string-led orchestral movement and synth-driven alternative, to a mnemonic jingle. The creation of a sound palette has been applied at HSBC’s physical events, in branches to identify when a cashier is ready, in ads, in content and even as a more palatable form of lift music.

 

“Don’t try to be international, try to be universal,” was Jarre’s advice to HSBC.

 

Growing pains

Yet audio technology is still lacking universal appeal, with some panellists expressing doubts, mostly hinged on its infancy.

 

Bloomberg’s Lanxon questioned the genuine usefulness of voice-activated tech as it stands, arguing it is “reminiscent of telephone message trees, because you still have to wait for polite responses before you can comment”.

 

HSBC’s Goulding had more sobering concerns over security and the intrusiveness of voice-activated devices, calling for greater rigour in voice identification, “so you know which customer is which”.

 

But Mindshare’s Pounder outlined a major challenge for publishers and worries around the sheer might of the tech giants —”the trade-off, the distribution of content to the biggest audience possible and the loss of control”.  “I guess the issue for many publishers is that it’s difficult to get people to come to you directly unless you’re a brand of a certain scale,” he said.

Photo: L-R Clancy Childs, Hamish Goulding, Jeremy Pounder, Nate Lanxon, Brenda Salinas, Sebastian Tomich

It’s awards season again and as the headlines from the Golden Globes, Oscars and Brits begin to fade, the spotlight is on an array of awards across the marketing industry. When we founded the World Media Awards, now in its fourth year, I felt there was a genuine need for a platform to celebrate the world’s best content-driven, cross-border advertising campaigns. Of course, the marketing and media industry is full of cynics and I’ve often had to stand my ground when detractors suggest that awards shows are nothing more than an excuse for ego-stroking and back-patting.

Being recognised for your achievements should be celebrated, whatever sector you happen to be in. Winning an award is good for business on a number of levels – it can boost employees’ morale knowing that they’ve contributed to something that has been acknowledged as exemplary work. It can raise awareness for your company, increase credibility and give you that competitive edge. But perhaps most importantly, award shows provide a benchmark to compare the performance of companies within any given industry. They praise the success of innovators, disruptors, those pushing the boundaries – and they deliver a standard for everyone to work towards.

As such, we are delighted that the World Media Awards have been included as one of the recently announced WARC Media 100 Rankings, alongside a number of other high profile award shows, including Adweek Media Plan of the Year, Cannes Lions, D&AD, Festival of Media, I-COM Data Creativity Awards, Internationalist Awards, M&M Awards, MMA Smarties and the WARC Media Awards.

The WARC Media 100 media rankings (the successor to the Gunn Report) are decided upon by a group of senior planners, strategists and media executives and they provide an unbiased standard for commercial creativity and media excellence.Based on the results of what are considered to be the most important advertising competitions around the world, the rankings allow agencies and brands to track and benchmark their performance against their peers in areas of creativity, effectiveness and media.

According to WARC’s David Tiltman, the award shows will be reviewed annually to ensure that the ones analysed for these rankings remain relevant, and reflect the opinion of the industry. So, not only is the WARC Media 100 a valuable tool for agencies and brands, it also keeps us, the award show producers, on our toes. If we’re upholding our end of the bargain and providing a platform that contributes to essential standard setting and measurement within the industry, perhaps even the most cynical marketer will admit that Awards Shows are more than just an ego-boosting jolly.